|
By Timothy P. Whalen
Among the developments of the 20th century was a worldwide recognition
of the concept of a cultural heritage that belongs to all of humanity.
Over the latter half of that century, UNESCO devotedand continues
to devotegreat efforts to promote the recognition of this
concept and to put in place international instruments for the protection
of cultural heritage around the globe.
During the same period, conservation became recognized as an important
field of research and an activity critical to the preservation of
the heritage that we now collectively treasure. Great advances have
been made. We know much better how to slow deterioration, how to
care for the objects in our museums, and how to protect our historic
sites. The artistic and cultural heritage of the world has never
held such interest and fascination for such a broad spectrum of
society. The resources devoted to conservationand the number
of cultural tourists and visitors to museumsall reveal the
value that we attribute to these objects and places.
And yet, despite this increased interest in conservation and the
growth of the concept of a world heritage that is universally valued,
the intentional destruction of heritage has by no means been relegated
to the distant past.
Periodicallyand more often than we would like to think possiblewe
are shocked by news and images of the willful destruction of objects
of heritage (the 1,500-year-old statues of Buddha in Bamiyan, Afghanistan,
are the most notable recent example). These acts of conscious and
intentional obliteration of objects of heritage are painful reminders
that the biggest conservation challenges we face are not necessarily
technical ones.
The desire of some to annihilate what others consider historic
or beautiful or sacred is an old oneone that has been present
throughout the ages, as Dario Gamboni reminds us in his feature
essay in this issue of Conservation.
Most in modern society, however, believe that these practices are
no longer acceptable. Earlier this year, when the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia handed down indictments
for the 1991 attacks by the armed forces of Yugoslavia on the ancient
port city of Dubrovnik, Croatia, the indictments included one for
the destruction of historic monuments. UNESCO Director-General Koïchiro
Matsuura noted the historic precedent this sets, as it is the first
time since the Second World War that attacks on cultural property
have been considered a crime by an international tribunal.
For those of us whose professional life is focused on conserving
heritage, it is painful to acknowledge that not only is our passion
not shared by all but that there are some in this world who can
and will vigorously eradicate what we work to preserve. Although
these destructive acts remain unjustifiable, I believe we must strive
to comprehend what lies behind the desire to destroy.
|